Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Melville Dundas Ltd (in receivership) and others vs George Wimpey UK Ltd and others
    2007-11-16

    The Case

    This is the first time that the HGCRA has reached the House of Lords. The dispute here, which related to the payment part of that legislation, highlighted the tension between an employer’s payment obligations and the impact on those obligations of the contractor going into administration. Here, on 2 May 2003, Melville applied for an interim payment. No withholding notice was served. The final date for payment was 16 May 2003. Wimpey did not pay, but on 22 May 2003 administrative receivers were appointed.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fenwick Elliott Solicitors, General contractor, Independent contractor, Withholding tax, Fair use, House of Lords
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
    Access to commercially sensitive information in bankruptcy
    2015-05-05

    To Seal or Not To Seal: Access To Commercially Sensitive Information In Bankruptcy Proceedings

    Filed under:
    USA, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, DelCotto Law Group PLLC, Fair use
    Authors:
    Jamie L. Harris
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    DelCotto Law Group PLLC
    What a long, strange “Tripp” it’s been: Eastern District of Virginia upholds sealing report under section 107
    2014-06-05

    Where a document filed under seal in a bankruptcy case has nothing to do with the bankruptcy itself, is the public entitled to access the document?  The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia considered this unique question in Robbins v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Fair use, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Eastern District of Virginia
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days